tick...tick ...tick.
Julia Mitchell, a ravishing fiery redhead of Junoesque proportions, has just turned thirty. The big three-oh. She's nominally engaged to the slippery Nigel Longman. Nigel is an up and coming doctor, with an up and coming job interview in Bristol. In the meantime, she's Sister for Women's Medical at a hospital in London. Sister Julia has a thorn in her side. Professor van der Wagema (41). Everyone knows they don't like each other. He runs the gamut from tiresome to icy cold to bitingly sarcastic. I know what you're thinking: He's the hero? Julia doesn't have a good opinion of him, but then again, he barely registers on her radar. She doesn't know a thing about him, and what's more, she doesn't care.
tick...tick...tick.
There must be some kind of trigger that gets the two antagonists thinking about each other - that trigger never gets revealed - but think about each other they do. Maybe Julia just needs to think about a vertebrate...and surprise, surprise, Professor van der Wagema has a fine backbone. Mighty fine. Even from the back he looked distinguished. Yeah, bum check. Her burgeoning interest in him just so happens to coincide with her dawning realization that the magic has gone out of her relationship with Nigel. Mind you, it's all baby steps at this point. In spite of working with Professor van der Wagema for over three years on the ward, she knows nothing about him. Is he married? Does he have children? Where does he live? None of these questions have ever flitted across her consciousness before. One of the questions is answered quite soon. He has an eleven year old son. That must mean he's married.
tick...tick...tick.
Julia showers a little unused maternal instinct on a stray kitten. Nigel is off in Bristol and doesn't bother to call her with a status update. In order to find out if he got the job, Julia resorts to calling the Invertebrate's mother. Yes, her darling boy got the job. Julia shows way too much forbearance with Nigel. He is thrilled to get the job, but not keen on getting married anytime soon. Maybe next year. Julia is supposed to be satisfied with his less than thorough kissing.
tick...tick...tick.
If you haven't guessed by now, the sound that you're hearing is Julia's biological clock. Nigel figures they can live in the hospital-provided-flat and Julia can continue to work for a year or two (that's after waiting the better part of a year to get married)...Julia is not a nurse for nothing - she knows she doesn't have all that many childbearing years left. She reflects to herself that '30 is such a depressing age.'
In order to fight off her depression, she decides to take a holiday back at Casa de Mitchell. She can potter around, do a little horseback riding and think. Think about what? The depressing lack of commitment that she's getting from Nigel. He's proving impossible to pin down and have a serious discussion with. In fact, Julia wonders what exactly they have to talk about - beyond work?
Let's just get off the subject of Nigel, okay? He's really not worth the word count.
Remember when I said that Professor van der Wagema has a son? Young Nicholas is a pretty useful plot device. The Professor hires Mr. Mitchell to tutor the lad in Latin. It's a wonderful excuse for him to meet Julia's family.
Julia's mother is like a marital-status heat seeking missle. In less time than it takes to say 'lobster Newburg' - she manages to winkle out the fact that he has been widowed for eight years. Cha-ching! He's single. And happy to drive Julia back to London at the end of her weekend. For No Reason Whatsoever, Julia tarts herself up for the ride home...even wearing her Gucci shoes! I hope you dressed yourself to kill on my account...says he, and then he kisses her! An engaged woman (yes, she's still engaged)! Their relationship is quickly changing from adversarial to friendly.
Nicholas is more than happy to spend weekends at Casa de Mitchell. Julia goes home for another visit and the two go riding together. Papa van der Wagema rides up on his
Her: Nicholas needs a mother...
Him: He'll have one soon...
Yes, it's that hoary old chestnut: I'm In Love With You and Plan to Marry You, But Until Then You Can Just Assume I'm Engaged to Someone Else. Aargh. This will continue for the next 80 pages. Despite that, or perhaps because of it, Lauris is looming larger and larger in her thoughts. Yes, that's the prelude to a Dawning Realization.
Lauris sees her distraught face in the morning and drags part of the truth from her - 'I can't marry Nigel'. He doesn't get to hear her confess her love for him yet, but you can bet he knows which way the Thames is flowing. Lauris snatches the opportunity to offer Julia a ride to Bristol - so as to have it out with Nigel. Risky business that. Taking the girl you love to meet her fiancee - there's always the possibility that they'll make up. Nope. After an initial 'You're throwing ME over?', Nigel seems positively relieved to have dodged the matrimonial bullet. Very lowering to a girl, but Lauris is right there to get the post-game wrap-up. He invites himself to dinner at her flat and asks for all the gory details.
Now that Nigel is out of the way, let's start dating! If only it were so easy. Julia is firmly of the opinion that Lauris is engaged. She does go out with him a couple of times, but always under protest 'what will your fiancee think?' Lauris could seal the deal PDQ if only he'd tell her that he loves her...not a mythical fiancee - but that's not how things roll in Neeldom. There are formalities. First of all, Julia must have lunch at his house, meet his housekeeper and his dog Digby (whose name always reminds me of an old article about the 'redshirt' characters in Star Trek - the author named the redshirts 'Digby and Johnson'...but I digress). The Sad Tale of Nicky's Mother is told. She left them when Nicholas was little - and went to America only to die of viral pneumonia (as you do...).
No, that's too far.
Okay, I'll take the bus from the British Museum.
Fine, but I'll walk you there.
It's a darn good thing he does, because they get caught in a demonstration. Lauris pushes Julia up against a wall and shelters her with...um...himself. Excuse me while I grab a fan. Wow, did it just get a little hot in here? Not only does he protect her with...um...himself, he then proceeds to Kiss Her Fiercely.
Christmas is coming and Lauris has invited Julia's two younger brothers to go to Holland for a few days with him and Nicholas. Would Julia please come too? Julia is only too happy (it will give her a chance to check out the fictional fiancee). But first she has to get a streaming head cold. Lauris comes up to her flatlet and bullies her into getting better. I'll have you up on your feet if it kills me. He makes tea, heats up soup, feeds Wellington (the kitten) and offers to wash her hair. Awww. His motive (besides being in love) has got to be the trip to Holland.
Lauris picks up all three boys, then stops by to get Julia. Night ferry from Harwich, he's got a lovely small castle with pepperpot towers, this is my mother, sleep well...
Julia gets up early in the morning to go exploring and is proposed to for her pains.
Him: You love me now, don't you?
Her:Yes, but what about your finacee?
Him: I never said I had a fiancee...I merely stated my intention of getting married. Nicholas knows I want to marry you, so does my mother, so does your mother. You're the only one who didn't get it.
Proposal, kissing. The end.Rating: This one was a mixed bag for me. Julia has dug herself into a very boring rut with Nigel. She's not getting any younger - and she's watching her dreams of a house in the country with 2.5 kids, a donkey, a pony, two dogs, a cat or two and a husband who loves her - slip slide away. Her dissatisfaction with Nigel isn't anything new in a Betty Neels, but it does ring true. She really does like him - but Nigel is unable/unwilling/too thick to see Julia as a real woman who has needs and a biological clock that is running down. I didn't appreciate how long The Nigel Affair lingered on in the book (she doesn't officially dump him until page 114!!). If you assume that the antagonistic feelings between Julia and Lauris at the beginning of the book are from suppressed desire, then his iciness and her statement "He's the most unfanciable man I know" (I♥Betty Neels)make more sense. Betty Neels dealt with a somewhat similar plotline much more deftly in Heidelberg Wedding (published the year before this one). If I had one wish for this book, it would be that we knew more of what Lauris was thinking. Such as, when did he fall in love with her? Before she fell for him, that much is obvious...but when? The best I can give it is a Mince Pie.
Food: A whole meal with capitalization - salad Niçoise, lobster Newburg, soufflé Harliquin. Macaroni cheese, cheese sandwich and lager after the cinema, cress sandwiches, chocolate cake, smoked salmon with brown bread and butter, omelette Diplomate (more capitalization!), peaches poached in champagne, mince pies, doughnuts, lobster soup, roast duck, syllabub with lashing of cream.
Fashion: The Professor wears slacks and a sport shirt (off duty), Julia wears old slacks and a disreputable sweater, an elderly corduroy skirt with a cotton sweater that had seen better days. She goes riding in slacks with an old out-at-elbows sweater and a bright scarf. When she 'dresses to kill', she wears a knitted jacket and skirt with a tucked silk blouse, all in grey, with her Gucci shoes.
Go figure -- I liked it. A lot, actually. It starts slowly, yes, but there's a drop of *gasp* realism to their situation. Lauris is pretty conscientious about making absolutely sure Julia doesn't still love Neville Longbottom (y'think J.K. Rowling read The Great Betty?). He doesn't kiss her too much -- just when he simply can't resist the urge -- and he's actually very kind.
ReplyDeleteMy favorite bit is one of his teaching rounds when he's surrounded by adoring med students who love him even though he reams them out. He looks up at Julia and smiles, and she knows in that minute why his students love him. Not Julia's dawning realization o'love as we're used to -- that's another 80 pages down the line -- but it's the point at which I fell for Lauris.
Nicky is a great kid -- not bratty at all. Martha doesn't poison his mind against Julia. And I liked that Lauris had told everyone, "Look, Julia is the love of my life and I plan to marry her. But she's just come out of a long-standing engagement and I can't move until I'm absolutely sure she's done with Dr. Longbottom and ready for Professor van der Tightbottom..." (Bum check indeed!)
So solid beouf en croute for me. I'd give it a Queen of Puddings but I agree, I did wish The Great Betty had allowed us to overhear the conversation in which Julia says, "But you were always so austere -- when did you know you loved me?" and he says, "I fell in love with you when you were a student nurse and slept through one of my lectures," or "I fell in love with you the day you galloped up the stairs and I wished so much that you were racing to meet me," or something.
Excellent review. The "I will be married" plot device is not something one wants to read too often.
ReplyDeleteI'd like to point out, and have done so elsewhere, that Nigel is never a hero's name. He's a wimpy secondary character or a slightly weak villain. (I feel the same way about Jeremy, but others strenuously disagree.) Neville, on the other hand (I'm talking to you Betty Magdalen) is a great name and J.K.Rowling should never have landed him with a surname like Longbottom.
And -- let me guess here -- Neville Chamberlain was a great prime minister? (I'd better watch out; he might have been her great uncle or something and then I'm in such trouble...)
ReplyDeleteBetty Barbara here--0
ReplyDeleteAren't Julia and Lauris the oldest couple Betty writes about? I don't think she had a heroine older than this Julia, but I'm not sure about the RDD.
I found this to be another one of her 'nice by forgetable' books. I enjoyed it while I read it, and your review brought it back to mind--but it won't stick around in my memory as some of the others do.
It usually takes me three or four times as long to read my assigned book...so instead of cozying up on the couch for a couple of hours, I usually have to spread my reading out over a couple of days...during that time, I kept forgetting which book this one was. I guess that's my biggest gripe.
ReplyDeleteI think Julia qualifies as the oldest heroine...Henrietta Brodie from Henrietta's Own Castle was 29 and spinsterish, as was Laura from the infamous The Hasty Marriage.
I think she's old even by Harlequin standards. [segue] I sometimes wonder if Harlequin didn't wince when it saw her ruthlessly killing off old people and children without a backwards glance when it suited her to move the plot along. And having plain and sometime thin or plump heroines, especially in the 70s and 80s when all the ones I read had gorgeous heroines...[/segue]
ReplyDeleteThis is one of those books where when I pick it up I find myself going "what's the plot about this one again?"
I did that, too, kitap. And I've read it before. Maybe unconsciously, I was hoping it had changed. lol
ReplyDeleteBetty Debbie, have you seen the older cover? This is even funnier considering this is the Charlie Sheen Cover. It really goes with your loser list above. ;-)
Oh yum, I get to type Scone for my Verifying Word. Now I'm hungry.
My choice for Most Unfancy. Gotta say Charlie looks the best, but this proves the saying about looks not being everything.
ReplyDeleteIf I drank milk it would be shooting out of my nose. I had never seen the Charlie Sheen/J Lo cover...gosh, the resemblence is uncanny...and kind of makes me like the book a little better.
ReplyDeleteI think this one takes the cake for worst vintage cover. It's like the illustrator got his notes mixed up with another book. I'm working on a better cover....
ReplyDeleteI have just seen the Charlie Sheen cover, and it looks like she is thinking he is the most unfanciable man ever right at that moment. Or maybe just “I can’t believe this creep is trying to kiss me.” If she leans any farther away she’ll break her neck.
DeleteOh dear. How many want to guess at who Betty JoDee is putting on the cover. Are his initials G.P by any chance? he he he
ReplyDeleteOne interesting observation. Whoever the illustrator was, he had an awareness of Charlie's proclivity for female abuse. That's a pretty tight clench and she doesn't look too happy. Charlie's philosphy being:When it comes to love if it's not rough, it isn't fun. But even Ga Ga wouldn't put up with his crap.
Okay, I admit that G.P. was my first thought, but I decided that too easy (although the time spent Photoshopping him would be bliss...) so The Littlest Princess' preschool teachers made suggestions, and The Heir and The Spare got in on the Googling act (the austere part was the tricky part). They suggested trying "unsmiling tall dark handsome actor"--some odd results that sent them into fits of laughter. Then they suggested (I have no idea why) "Italian tall dark etc.). Not quite what I needed but did point me in the right direction. Spirited, take no crap, red-head was obvious.
ReplyDeleteAlas, I have hours of Photoshop ahead and leaving on spring break (The Professor's laptop has no Photoshop on it) so I can't promise when I'll have it done but should be worth the wait.
Reading The Canon, one gets the impression that the men of The Netherlands have a certain look. Well, for my other blogging job, I use Flickr all the time. Here, then, are some Dutchmen:
ReplyDeleteDarker than an RDD but not bad.
This is more likely to be the younger brother. No RDD ever had curly hair.
Here's someone named Henk -- I'm thinking that's the partner in one of the RDD's practices.
I don't know what to make of this guy. Maybe he's the "bad" younger brother. (Although from his bio, he sounds like a really nice guy!)
Of course, my favorite good-looking Dutchman is Hugo van Lawick, formerly married to Jane Goodall. Quite the cutie in the 60s. Here's a photo with him in the middle (other two guys are Spanish). And he was a baron, too -- so you get extra points for being in the Adel!
Betty – Bettier – the Bettiest
DeleteHugo van Lawick? Well chosen, Betty Magdalen.
Extra points for:
1. being from adel. Hugo Arndt Rodolf Baron van Lawick
2. having gone to boarding school!! in Devon!!!
3. 'The boy's Hugo, of course,...' Hugo and Jane had a son Hugo Eric Louis Baron van Lawick, nicknamed "Grub"
Hey Betty Magdalen, I was trolling for dutchmen, too. I was thinking this guy. He's rarely w/o his beard or heavy whiskers, lots of moles to cover maybe. So that removes him from my ideal RDD list, but others might not mind the look. I've looked at videos of him speaking English and Dutch and man he's very appealing in both languages. But I don't like his characters in most of the stuff I watched. So I'm not really sure if he's leading man material. But he's got killer dimples. And the best reason is his name is
ReplyDeleteYorick van Wageninge If that isn't authentic, then I'm a Dutchman. 8-)
Alas, poor Yorick (sorry, couldn't resist)...I haven't seen any of his movies except for part of The Chronicles of Riddick(ulous)...which was so badly acted (by the leading man),that I had to turn it off - nothing will induce me to submit to that torture again. Besides that, he is pretty easy on the eyes.
ReplyDeleteHugo van Lawick, excuse me, Baron Hugo van Lawick was a babe...I can certainly overlook the fact that he's a tad short for a RDD.
I handed you that one, Betty Debbie.
ReplyDeleteI decided not to hog all the good jokes! And I really love that Dutchman saying! lol
Hugo is okay, but the shortness dooms him for us Olivia types.
I'm loving the first two guys on Betty Magdalen's post. #1 gots the ice blue eyes and dark hair, there was at least one of those. I'll take that outlier any day.
And hair can be cut, #2 would be one of the younger RDD's. Weren't there a few in there late twenties? Yep, them's keepers. ;-)
Of course there is the always gorgeous Rutger Hauer! What more of a Dutchman does anyone in the world need???
ReplyDeleteI second that remark.
ReplyDeleteBetty Keira, you have superb taste!
ReplyDeleteMotion carried...Rutger Hauer it is.
ReplyDeleteSaw Rutger Hauer today in a film with Michelle Pfeiffer - made in 1985 so nearly 30 years old . . .
ReplyDeleteBetty Barbara here--
DeleteOh!!! I LOVE LadyHawke!!!! One of my all time faves (in spite of Matthew Broderick, who was soooo anachronistic!!).
Try this:
ReplyDeletehttps://www.google.co.uk/search?q=rutger+hauer&client=firefox-a&hs=kPV&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ei=qAHGUd-VM8Gj0QX9ioCYBQ&ved=0CJQBEIke&biw=1280&bih=887
Whenever I see or hear the name Rutger Hauer I am reminded of the film which started out with the camera zooming in on him lying on his bed wearing red socks...
DeleteThis is how I see him - this is the YouTube description (there are many others):
DeleteUploaded on 30 Aug 2008
Guinness Ad from 1990 featuring the actor Rutger Hauer.
Guinness Ad - Rutger Hauer. Is that it? That's much better. Mind you it was red socks only...
DeleteNigel is a monstrous villain in his quiet way. He wastes two years of Julia's life (and intended to waste more before inevitably dumping her) knowing that she wanted a family. Then has the nerve to imply the blame is all Julia's as she is not 'young'. "Carve yourself a career for a couple of years and then find a nice girl—a nice young girl.’ She added quietly: ‘I’m right, aren’t I?’...He sounded relieved to have been given a loophole. ‘Funny you should say that—Mother said the same thing when I was home. You think it’s the right thing to do?’ Absolutely unforgivable (and still hiding behind Mother's Apron).
ReplyDeleteThe one thing we have learnt in Neelsdom that if a wedding is not conducted as soon as it is legally permissible then the engaged party is fair game.Being from the School of Mutual Antagonism equals Suppressed Desire, Lauris has been waiting three years for Julia. (We don't think she registered to him as a student as he was otherwise occupied at the time) . Her 30th birthday (and the conclusions drawn from the hospital grapevine) is his signal to move. She is old enough for an eleven year old step son and young enough to have the children she so desperately desires.
There is melancholy undercurrent in this book as Julia muses about the inequity of life. There was a sprinkling of grey in his dark hair and she thought how unfair it was that a man approaching forty-two could still attract admiring glances from the girls, while a woman of thirty worried herself sick at the mere thought of being thirty-one. Yes, they are on the older side of MB protagonists but there is a greater poignancy in that they find each other in time.
British word question: "Why, wondered Julia, sitting uneasily [in the Bristol hospital waiting room] did hospital authorities go nap on green?"
ReplyDelete"Go nap on"--go all in on? have an unfathomable fondness for? fall back on? choose to use and ignore all other colors?
I really liked this one--up to a point. Julia is mature not just in age, and Lauris is kind and wonderful in many ways, but he is a coward and a liar and causes her needless pain. When he tells her she is in love with him, she says straight out, "That's unfair but quite true." Then he asks the usual, didn't it occur to you I might be in love with you? and she says No, "thinking of his austere manner on the ward"--although his manner outside of the hospital has led her to wonder that maybe he does like her more than a little.
Then! Then she says, "And you can't be [in love with me]--you're going to be married."
And he says (as quoted above, but it's so irritating, it has to be repeated), "I never said I had a fiancee, I merely stated that I intended to get married. There's a difference if you think about it."
Oh let's parse words now! If you intend to get marrie
Julia is entirely correct to say "I'm in no state to think, and why didn't you tell me?"
His "defense" is pathetic. "And so anxious not to poach on my fiancee's preserves..." Well hello, do you want a girl who *will* poach on another's fiance? Cheat with you, she'll cheat on you. Besides, he's saying it's basically her own stupid fault for thinking he was engaged to someone else. No, she asked him more than once about his fiancee, his wedding plans, etc. and he said things like, "She wouldn't mind, she trusts me..." Maybe in the future Julia won't trust him so much. He told his mother to tell her that he had a fiancee. That's not passively allowing her to believe a misinterpretation, that's actively supporting that misbelief.
It's not as bad as A Kind of Magic, which ranks somewhere near brussel sprouts for me, because those main characters were just unbearably terrible, but in some way it's worse because this was otherwise a good story with really nice main and supporting characters, and it was just so disappointing.
B. Baersma
We understand 'go nap on' to be slang for (heavily) favour.
ReplyDeleteIt was not Lauris's intent to cause Julia pain (or embarrassment). He hadn't reckoned upon Julia not discerning that she was the mythical fiancee. Afterall, it was mere hours after Lauris observed Julia did not know what she was afraid that she has her dawning realisation. He assumed she would make the connection with the same rapidity. He stressed that his fiancee was sensible (something he told Julia twice), that she had been away for the weekend, their future plans are the same and haec olim meminisse iuvabit. Nicky was dropping hints that he expected her to be a permanent fixture in his life by Christmas. It was his treatment of her on the ward that muddied the waters.
Yes, it is unfortunate that his mother continued the charade but this is MB-ville (where word counts matter) and the hero can only be certain that the heroine loves him (and over the ex) if she is jealous. Lauris realised he went too far with his campaign of misinformation as Julia was withdrawing from him. Julia will always trust Lauris as they had built that part of the relationship prior to the courtship. Any doubts she may have will be over-ridden by her deep desire for children and a house to manage both of which Lauris is more than prepared to give.
That is a defense almost as convincing as Betty Magdalen's Hugo-analysis ("Lauris realised he went too far with his campaign of misinformation" -- good line). And yes, it can be explained by Plot Device Necessary to Move through the Page Count. This may remain on my "enjoyed" list but will probably not go into my "read again" list.
ReplyDeleteB. Baersma