Monday, January 17, 2011

Stars Through the Mist--1973

I wasn't crazy about last week's hero because he's a suave man-of-the-world who, after sustaining a Youthful Disappointment and without really understanding his future wife at all, plonks a bloodless offer of marriage before a girl who loves him and then practically ruins her life. And, oh my heck, that's exactly the set-up for Stars Through the Mist. And I really liked it.

Somebody get a chapel and a choir to sing...!
Deborah Culpeper (Why does Betty Debbie get all the fun?) has turned down several offers of marriage.  She's a nice-looking 27-year-old Theatre Sister with a quiet, self-controlled manner and efficient way about her job.  This is probably all that Mr. Gerard van Doorninck, 37, knows for sure.
On the strength of his assumptions, he follows her into her office at the ragged end of one very trying day and asks her as baldly as possible: How do you feel about marrying me?
Deborah must restrain the impulse to throw herself across the blotter (never mind the off-duty and the laundry rota) and grab at his lapels shouting ecstatically, 'Yes, yes, yes!!! A thousand times yes!', dancing off waving her nurses' cap and singing with glee, 'Somebody's getting married!'
She has been in love with this man since the moment he asked her to hand him his first Langenbeck retractors more than two years ago and no amount of chatting up by eager young housemen is going to change that.
So, here we are.  Gerard, laboring under the false premise that her single status is because of her cold-fishyness and inner reserve, proposes a partnership. (The job description is your standard MOC contract deal: No implied conjugal relations, no pledges of mutual affection, run the home, entertain the guests, pour the tea, weather ill-temper, consent to treatment that the authentic Chippendale davenport wouldn't put up with, etc.)  He proposes because she feels safely encased in ice (as he is) and never guesses that her reserve is so absolute because for the last two years it's been quite a job stemming the tide of her nigh on uncontrollable passion..
I'd rather be miserable with
you than without you...
She tells him that she will give him his answer in a couple of days and works her way around to a Gigi-esque compromise (weighing her desire to be with him against her own potential for an awful life) and says yes.  But she wants to know about his marriage--the first one.
'Did you love your wife?'
He said with a bitter little sneer which hurt her, 'All women are curious...'
'Well, I'm not all women...and I'm not in the least curious...but it's something I should have to know.'
He doesn't volunteer much but Sasja, it seems, was a mistake.
That's good enough for Deborah.  She consents to an elopement (Well, what else do you call getting married without friends or family and sneaking your wedding hat on in the car in case anyone should see?) and then they're speeding their repressed way down to her parent's home.
But just when you're grabbing the hankies and wondering how this will manage to avoid becoming the Thornbirds they're chatting about room assignments and willing to toss for the dubious honor of faking a migraine on their wedding night in case Mama Culpeper wants to bunk them together.
And then we're off to Holland where, if we read the subtext right, Gerard still doesn't love his wife.  The evidence, Mr. Prosecutor, if you please:
  1. No Home Tour of Love--and worse, her new mother-in-law takes her on the tour instead of an anonymous, if well-loved, family retainer who will promptly forget the Master's carelessness.
  2. Gerard makes no mention of finding someone to give her Dutch lessons.  Sure, she rings up the ubiquitous Professor Wit but Gerard neither knows nor cares. I know he gives her a car but in Neels a car might simply mean, 'You may run your own errands.'
  3. Despite making her skin crawl, Gerard's cousin Claude van Trapp is allowed to run tame at her home.  
Yeah.  About that flesh-eating virus...Claude is a nasty piece of work.  His first bit of undermining is to tell her all about Sasja and to shoot poisonous darts at Deborah.  She's up to the challenge, however, and makes mincemeat of him.  And it's handy that Gerard overhears both his cousin's slander and his wife's defense (heroic defense considering she knew none of the details of her husband's life).  Out goes Claude on his ear and we'll catch up to him at the end.
The middle of the book then becomes a character study about how well Deborah manages to hold up under the grim conditions--her husband neither acknowledging her efforts (but then, the point is that he shouldn't see any effort) nor conceding an inch of hard-won independence.  She exhibits determined resoluteness to ignore that ravishing woman he was seen driving with, hurt and wonder (how was she to know he liked children?) that his relationship with her little sister, Maureen, should be so natural, sudden uplifts of  hope when he meets her at the ferry just so she won't have to drive home in a torrent, all that trying to learn his language and make friends with his friends, plunging despair when (in the wake of a tractor accident) he calls her strapping, and full of strength and common sense...
And just as you're at your wits end with these two crazy kids, Claude the Debaucher of Young Maidens waltzes back in through the sadly not dead-bolted door in the garden.  (And thank heavens he does or this balloon would have had a short and unhappy flight.)  He sees her trying on a wickedly expensive Gina FratiniFratini!) and she doesn't struggle as mightily as she might otherwise because, after all, she was wearing a Gina Fratini.  But she does slap him.  But Gerard, walking in unexpectedly, isn't of a mind to praise her heroics.  He only saw the non-struggling and when he dresses her down for being apparently willing, he deserves her scorn.  'I bought this dress because you told me to and I've charged it to you--it's a model and it cost over a thousand gulden, and I'm glad!  I wish it had cost twice as much!'
Deborah could have really used a handy
guide to inter-religious Dutch conflicts
Gerard goes out of town almost immediately and Deborah decides to pass her time by volunteering in a Catholic orphanage--a bit of a sticky wicket as Gerard is a Calvinist and there were some familial beheadings in the way-back.  (Deborah was probably very lucky that she hadn't wandered into an Arminian orphanage.  Actually, as Calvinists are big into predestination, it probably wasn't luck, per se...)
Gerard finds out that she's gone every week but doesn't know where.  'Where do you go Thursday evenings?' he asks. But he hasn't earned the right to ask and he knows it, so accepts her refusal to tell.
She is in a lorry accident and he's aghast she thinks he doesn't care two straws about what happens to her.  But now he wants to make headway and invites Deborah see his consulting rooms wherein he has a hot, nubile secretary.  (Hmm, thinks Betty Keira, puckering her brow.  If she's not on her way out and already sporting an engagement ring, then what is she doing in Neelsdom?)  It seems as though Claude the Debaucher of Young Maidens has finally found a girl willing to ruin her reputation in Nice (French for Brighton).  But Gerard walks in, assumes the worst (that his wife as arranged to snog his cousin at his place of business), clocks Claude and makes some wild accusations. 
Finally the secretary, on the way out the door with her lover, fesses up to Gerard.  (How does that conversation with the boss go, I wonder?  Mr. van Doorninck, I just don't like my retirement pension plan here and the dental plan isn't that good...so I'm running away to live in sin with your sleazy cousin.)  But it's too late to apologize.  Gerard returns to his house to find that Deborah has packed her bags.  She's going to Scotland.
In Scotland there is mist, St. Julian's botany class, and Gerard and stars.  (I would go on about this sometimes adorable interlude but I'm annoyed that Deborah and Gerard resolve nothing (nor does she extract a serious enough abasement and apology) while there.)
They return to Holland together and it looks like ruts will be stuck in but one day he finds her at the orphanage and catches her mid-game when her back it turned.   They sort themselves out amidst the clamor of young children.  He is agreeably ecumenical...
The End

Rating:  I loved the beginning.  Deborah is a near-tragic figure, swathed in a mask from head to toe, hiding her love away from a man whose first name she doesn't even know.  (High drama, Betty!)
The middle wasn't as good as its early promise, lingering too long on the placid day-to-day of life as a neglected wife in Holland but, then, that's sort of the point. Nothing ever happens to Gerard because Gerard doesn't let it happen and so Deborah's plan of action is to insinuate herself rather than bust molds and shatter calm.  The altercations regarding Claude van Trapp don't have quite enough set-up for me and I think Betty might have siphoned off some of her talk about tea and jewelry to give to him.  But then, he's a quite tantalizing character with lurid passions (spiriting off a young secretary to the French equivalent of Brighton--though, honestly, isn't the entire country just a great big Brighton?), fierce jealousy, and real meanness.
By the end, La Neels gives us a great walloping finish--the image of them embracing in a mass of orphans, young children of the kind that Gerard would have denied them both, is darling.
I give this a Boeuf en Croute.

Food: By agreeing to marry him, Deborah trades cold beef, salad and rice pudding for Supreme de Turbot Mogador. (Turbot is a kind of flat fish and I leave it to you to determine if her trade was a trade up or a mixed bag.) 

Fashion: Hospital masks which are symbolic.  A pinafore dress (you know my thoughts on these) in green ribbed silk.  Her wedding outfit is a pale blue dress and jacket with a wisp of a hat she doesn't put on until she's in the car so her friends can't see.  In Holland she wears a pink silk jersey and a soft lavender chiffon with a plunging neckline discretely hidden by frills  Rescuing the farmer she ruins a tweed outfit a replaces it with a white silk, long-sleeved, pin-tucked Gina Fratini number that cost the earth.

28 comments:

  1. A few weeks ago, I started thinking, "Which one has the Catholic orphanage...?" and it was this one. (I'm glad now I didn't ask. I'd have looked a right Charlie...)

    I think I love this book more now than I did back in the day. (I hope everyone appreciates that I was reading The Great Betty before Betty Keira was even born. I am *that* old.) There's a poignancy to Deborah's dealings with her mother-in-law that really resonate now that I'm older. Mama van Doorninck is grieving her considerably-older-than-she husband and sees a relative of that grief in Deborah's eyes. And why isn't Gerard happier?

    That's why the middle of the book doesn't bother me -- because as hard as Deborah's working to get Gerard to love her (or at least notice her) she's working twice as hard to be a good wife. And you're right -- it's a mugg's game. Only when she bursts into tears does Gerard realize ("D'oh!") that her effortless fulfilling of the marital contract doesn't mean that she found it easy.

    I'm personally a great believer that our subconscious can sort out a lot of things without our noticing it. My guess is that when Gerard's father dies (a great loss that he never gets much time to grieve), and he knows it's time for him to leave London and return to Amsterdam, the idea to marry Deborah pops into his head.

    No, he's not in love with her, but if you think about it, there has to be some impetus to marry her as opposed to waiting until he's settled in Holland before finding someone there. I think he doesn't want to lose her, even if he has no idea why not. But once he's gotten her home and installed in the household, he's not sure what she represents (happiness! companionship! love! implicit conjugal bliss!!) so he stays away.

    Anyway, I'm short-listing it for a top 20 list.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Alternate Title: Stuck in the Muck
    Wouldn't have gotten better than a Mince Pie
    on the BettyMary scale.
    (It's a Betty after-all and even The Little Dragon (myleastlikedBetty)
    gets a cheese board but only because I like cheese more
    than treacle tart and winecake, so really that makes it a 6.)
    Ooops, have we done that one yet? Disregard my rantings.
    lol
    I mean how blind can a guy be? After she says she'll help keep the big house clean,
    he says: "You'll be busy enough in other ways."
    "What other ways?" she asked with "vague suspicion."
    Here's your chance big guy! But NO, it takes 140 more pages to even suggest any conjugal possibilities!
    Gerard (I don't like this name, but I'm so glad no one called him Jerry! UGH) never really has a Dawning Realization. His is a mud pie in the face standing in the Orphanage.
    At least Debbie shows a little chutzpah (can Anglicans do this?) by making the now finally 'ready' Gerard wait while she reads to the kiddies. Go Debbie!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gerard - you don't like this name, Betty Mary. Perhaps you will like it better in its "native" pronunciation.

      I found a video with a slightly "harder" pronunciation: Myrthe mag Gerard wakker maken (Myrthe may wake up Gerard)
      You'll hear the name many times starting from (1:04): "Het is nu het moment om Gerard wakker te maken."

      Delete
  3. Oh, and I forgot. She gets this dinky little wedding without even a maid of honor or a parent there, and the big stiff gets her a corsage instead of a bouquet!!! Because - get this - she might not want her nurse friends to get wind of the wedding. AFTER he's already stole her thunder during an operation. Announcing to everyone that they're engaged! And He could have arranged for the bouquet when he ordered the flowers for the alter, right? What's a bride without a bouquet, corsages are for your 90 y.old grandmother! Man, that would have ended it for me!!! (I'm done now, I think.)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ummm... I did really like the cover. ;-) Doesn't the Guy look like Rod Taylor (of Time Machine fame).
    And the the heroine is a dead ringer (no pun intended, you'll see why later) for Gloria Stuart. The pic on this site change on top. The last dot is the best one.
    She was in 'Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm' with Shirley Temple - and - in the 'Titanic' as the main character in the present time.
    She died last year at 100 years old.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Betty Mary -- Okay, no bouquet, but Deborah's already at that "don't let people see we're getting married" place long before the corsage, long before the hat even. She was annoyed that he announced it in the operating room! Plus, he's coated the church in flowers, which is better in some ways because they'll last.

    Who would she have thrown the bouquet to?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I love the idea that Deborah sublimates her maternal yearnings by volunteering in the orphanage--and that the orphans represent future implied pledges of affection.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I am desolate, Betty Mary, that you don't love The Little Dragon which has always been one of my favorites if only due to the hero's sister dumping her beverage on someone on purpose.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Betty Barbara here--

    A couple of quick comments--
    That was a saddest excuse for a wedding in all Neelsdom. Big Whoop--he ordered in all those flowers--I hope the congregation appreciates them. She should have had a bouquet, even a small one, to tuck away in a chest after the wedding.
    I was appalled by his "hey everyone, nurse and I are getting married" gaffe. Deborah is not ashamed that they are getting married, she just doesn't want to face all the questions and risk losing control over her emotions.
    I still think she should have asked one of her fellow nurses to stand up with her. And he couldn't be bothered to ask one of his friends to pop over from Holland to be best-man? Oh really??
    Deborah's parents were a bit too much, especially hippy-dippy mom. But I quite liked young Maureen.
    Further proof Gerard doesn't love her, even a smidge--he keeps calling her a 'strapping' young woman, and then being totally puzzled when Deborah doesn't care for it!
    The whole Scotland interlude, while very charming, didn't really seem to fit. It just seemed a way to work the title reference into the story.
    I do believe this is one of the few Betty books in which religion plays an important part.

    Betty Magdalen--you are quite right. Poor Ole' Gerard is obviously grieving for his father and is numb to all else. I don't believe he is ever intentionally cruel to Deborah--he is just too oblivious to the fact that he is being cruel.

    ReplyDelete
  9. My problem with this book is that all of these cute things happened and then they didn't go anywhere. The accident with the lorry, the tractor vs farmer debate and the random kidlets on the moor, they all had such potential but the just fell flat IMO

    ReplyDelete
  10. Betty Barbara -- Well, when I objected to another RDD's cruelty (and I can't find it -- there's 30 minutes of my life I'll never get back -- but basically an Araminta overhears the RDD say how blah she is), I was shot down. And what that guy said is way worse than the worst thing Gerard says to Deborah, so I can speak from experience when I say that Gerard won't be found guilty by a jury of your peerless Bettys.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with Betty Kylene (Samurai Mom) that avenues that lead nowhere is exactly the problem. As much as I loved the end, there's no reason (aside from publishing concerns) why things couldn't have been wrapped up in Scotland on the moors. As it is, we get some vague comments and then someone hits the reset button that sends them back to Holland with nothing resolved.

    Still, I liked it pretty well--Deborah is such a stalwart and really earns the right to throw her few tantrums.

    ReplyDelete
  12. so I can speak from experience when I say that Gerard won't be found guilty by a jury of your peerless Bettys.
    (In a sing song bratty kinda way)
    I don't know, Betty Magdalen.
    The ruling right now is:
    Gerard van Doorninck - Accused of Gross insensitivity in regards to Sizism, Bouquet deprivation, and not taking advantage of the numerous opportunities to stop his convenient wife's unnecessary suffering.
    If I'm reading this post right, we've got Two Innocent, by reason of it makes a good story,
    One Abstention, by reason that she (she being Debbie, the jurist, not Debbie, the aggrieved convenient wife) is lost in the orphanage.
    Three GUILTY by reason of the Guy is a Schmuck and he did all that stuff, just read the the book!

    ReplyDelete
  13. Betty Keira, I loved the dumping the drink part, but it didn't make up for the continued use of a hated nickname throughout the book, RIGHT UP TIL THE END. Okay, I'll admit I'm a bit 'derogatory nickname' sensitive.
    I intend to re-read when you do the review so I promise to keep an opener mind this time. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  14. Betty Mary -- Under Anglo-American jurisprudential principles, he's found not guilty. It's got to be a unanimous verdict.

    But the anti-Gerard sentiment just strikes me as odd. He never says anything mean to her (and there are thems as does, if you know what I mean), he's grieving his father, he's not in love with her, he was burned by an unfaithful first wife, and he says that he's not found much pleasure in life. Now, I could argue that suggests he needs an antidepressant more than a wife, but it also suggests he's perhaps worthy of some slack.

    The reasons that those who voted guilty did so is that they don't like the book enough. If you'd liked the book (as I did) you might have voted Not Guilty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Betty Magdalen. Besides, Betty Magdalen’s writing makes me giggle, snicker, and often laugh out loud when everyone else is asleep. Next question: when oh when can we read her novels?!

      Delete
    2. Betty fetesuzette, they are available on Amazon, for Kindle or paperbacks.
      Betty Anonymous

      Delete
  15. You may have a point, Betty Mags. After slogging through all those missed versions of a 'meet cute' or should it be 'the gobsmack of love', we just stopped caring if he'd ever wake up. I was just wanting it all to end like Bill Murray in Ground Hog Day.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Lalalalalalala! I love this book. That said, I will now go back and read all the comments!!

    ReplyDelete
  17. I'm with Opramum..... lalala - I liked this book too. BUT I loved the review. OMG, the vocabulary is this hole thread - was awesome and funny at the same time.

    "...finally found a girl willing to ruin her reputation in Nice (French for Brighton)" and LOL "(spiriting off a young secretary to the French equivalent of Brighton--though, honestly, isn't the entire country just a great big Brighton?)"
    " Actually, as Calvinists are big into predestination, it probably wasn't luck, per se...)"
    "He is agreeably ecumenical..."
    (and Betty Mary (the other one :)... says)
    "he says: "You'll be busy enough in other ways."
    "What other ways?" she asked with "vague suspicion."
    Here's your chance big guy! But NO, it takes 140 more pages to even suggest any conjugal possibilities! " (cracked me UP!)

    I don't think the book's in my top 10 but it's DEFINITELY not the worst! - I'd reread this one again I'm sure....

    ReplyDelete
  18. I wanted to tell you how much I loved this review -- it's a good thing I wasn't drinking water as I read it or I would have anointed my laptop but good!

    ReplyDelete
  19. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I really wanted to like this book, but it never went where I thought it was going and it ended up flat. Gerard’s mom kept dropping hints about how he’d talked about Deborah with her. I thought it was going to be an “I‘ve loved you all along and married you so that you could grow to love me.” Instead it was like a bad murder mystery, with Betty throwing out false DR-ready moments for him (tractor accidents, car accidents, kiddies in the mist) and tempting us with yacht mentions (with nary a yacht to be seen) and needing to go to Vienna “to be sure of something involving someone besides myself” - we never hear anything more about that, either. Plus, he overheard quite enough about Claude the debaucher to have no excuse to acuse her of Brighton-ish feelings for him) Maybe Betty was trying out DR ideas for later use in better books. Gerard’s a jerk, ( I didn’t know you could knit. Really?) but not as bad as the sister-dating creep in Winter Wedding. (I know WW is one of your faves but let me just say ew.)

    What’s Betty for meh? Treacle tart?

    Another great review. Just sorry I ‘m so late to the party. And this Betty doesn’t do Facebook.

    Please don’t print this twice. I thought it was submitted but it popped up unsent.

    ReplyDelete
  21. I didn't mind nasty Gerard right until he believed his secretary right after he did not believe his wife! The only way he knows his wife isn't Brighton-bound is because his secretary vouches for her.

    ReplyDelete
  22. I liked this one better the second time around... did anyone else notice Gerard’s mother’s comments to Deborah when she first met her? Didn’t she say that Gerard had described Deborah on several occasions? I’m thinking that Gerard hadnoticed Debirah - maybe for a few years - but had been too shut down to recognize hIs interest. Too much fear, hurt, and sadness, so that he was reluctant to admit his interest - but his own mother recognized the hope that Deborah represented to him. Once I fastened onto this tidbit, I was able to reread this Book with more belief. I really like it - and I love all the comments through the years! I wish you would form a consortium and write a Group-Betty novel together... Thanks again for this site.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with the Group-Betty novel idea! Please do!

      Delete
    2. Have you read “The Huge Roses,” a delightful novella by Betty van den Betsy in the style of The Great Betty? Click on Blog Archive-2014-January-New Year’s Resolution.

      Delete
  23. I agree with you fetesuzette, this comes up well on re-reading it. I was a bit iffy about it originally, but having now read it again, it has a lot going for it. I liked Deborah and her attitude. After being in love with Gerard for so long, being married to him would have been half heaven and half not so heavenly. She soldiered on very well and came up trumps in the end.

    ReplyDelete